|
by
Tom
the Actuary
So which
is it?
Do
wrestling promotions get wrestlers over by making them look good? Or does being
over with the fans determine who will be booked to look good?
Well, yes
to both, obviously.
Let's
start with a list of things that will cause a promoter to "put over" a
wrestler. Being "put over" in this context means being booked to win matches
or, at least, look strong in losing matches.
P1.
Popularity (or heat) with fans
P2.
Potential
popularity (or heat) with fans
P3.
Political
or family connections
P4.
Company
loyalty
Now, a
list of things that get a wrestler "over" with fans. "Getting over", as used
here, means being either popular or hated, as appropriate:
F1.
Great
matches
F2.
Great
promos
F3.
Charisma
F4.
Appearing
to be a winner
If you
look back at the development of the Rock, he was initially booked to win as a
face due to what the WWF saw as potential (P2), then de-pushed for being
heatless - or, more accurately, drawing the wrong kind of heat. When he
returned as a heel, he was given a second IC title run and a feud with Steve
Austin, during which he started to draw tremendous heat (P1) due to great promos
and charisma (F2 and F3). He maintained this for a while, then received a
tremendous boost by being put cleanly over the Undertaker and Mankind, so now he
is drawing incredible heat (P1) and appears a formidable wrestler (F1) as well
as having awesome promo skills and charisma (F2 and F3). Finally, upon once
again becoming a face, he steadily has improved his match performance, to the
point that, over the last 7 months or so, he has been the WWF's top actual match
performer (F4). So, the guy is hitting on all cylinders, and you have the top
face in the company, and one of the top-three all-time.
Many
people who read columns like this one seem to have a problem with ANYONE being
put over for reasons P2, P3 and P4, i.e., due to perceived potential or because
of who they know or because the company wants to reward them for loyalty. For
example: Albert is put over because Vince loves (sees potential in) the big
guys. X-Pac is supposedly put over (as much as he is) because he's a friend the
H-meister. UT is put over to reward the guy for years of dedicated service -
you know, instead of getting a gold watch, a pen, and a plaque, like he would
anywhere else.
Recent
wrestling history is full of wrestlers "put over" by promoters who never "get
over" with fans. This is a fairly common phenomenon in the WWF, as they give
almost every wrestler some kind of push (i.e., title) to see how over they can
get with it. They all do to some degree, but only a few get OVER. A few
examples: IC title runs by The Godfather and Billy Gunn, KOTR victories by Gunn
and Ken Shamrock, title runs by Perry Saturn, the Hollys, and so on. Gunn was
over in the New Age Outlaws, and as a reward for loyalty, they kept trying to
strike gold again with him through various personas, but they have apparently
given up, as indicated by the fact he no longer rates his formerly weekly
mention in the Ross Report. He is pretty much doing the Dennis Knight Memorial
Jobbing Tour these days.
On the
other hand, there are also many examples of wrestlers "getting over" who were
never "put over" - Chris Jericho in WCW being the classic case. The Hardyz got
themselves over without benefit of promos (the fastest way) through great match
work and slowly developing charisma. And they continue to improve.
So we
have four categories:
C1.
Wrestlers
who are put over by promoters and get over with the fans. (Top tier performers)
C2.
Wrestlers
who are put over by promoters but don't get over with the fans. (On the way
down the card OR over overpushed)
C3.
Wrestlers
who are not put over by promoters but get over with the fans. (On the way up
the card OR pointlessly underutilized)
C4.
Wrestlers
who are neither put over by promoters nor get over with the fans. (Jobbers or
characters change candidates)
Running a
wrestling promotion is a complicated business I wouldn't even begin to
understand. If promotions knew a sure-fire way to get wrestlers over with the
public, they would do it, but there is no such way. Every performance starts
the process of getting characters over again. What worked yesterday might not
work today, and what works in one city won't work in another.
Still,
second-guessing the bookers provides people's favorite entertainment in these
parts, and for good reason: we can't possibly be proven wrong or right. The
basic premise of such discussions is "I think I know how to book better than the
bookers, and try and PROVE ME WRONG." I can't prove anyone wrong, but I do know
this: there is only one wrestling promotion of any size left in the United
States, and this promotion can be pardoned for having a lot of confidence in
their own booking ability.
But
remember, for the best in independent booking ideas, available, free, and on the
web - "S" Marks the spot.
|